Rising Together in Protection of Life
Yzabelaah Samahra Rose
May 2019 / updated August 2020
We live on the threshold between two worlds, and what the new world, that we will live in will be, hangs so delicately in the balance. In these times, when so much is uncertain before us, life invites us to live and to listen ever deeper, and to act and inhabit this present moment fully.
We live in troubled times. I believe no one would argue against this statement, since it is reflected to us currently from all angles. Increasingly, there are accepted narratives on what the main issues are and how we need to respond. But what happens if you disagree with the accepted narrative? In the words of one of my favourite feminist writers and social activists, Bell Hooks, ‘We are in danger of silencing any form of speech that goes against what is perceived as the status quo.’ (1). Bell goes on to express how when we reflect on the history of silencing, it is the dissident radical voices that are silenced and ultimately this silencing causes more suffering for us all. She calls us to develop the capacity not just to hear information, but also to think critically about it.
Until a few years ago, I had identified as part of the green movement and had rejected much of what the mainstream offers on a purely felt, intuitive level. Raised by parents who had in many ways rejected the mainstream themselves, an alternative paradigm is simply in my blood. In recent years, as I scratched below the surface of the green movement I began to see things differently, bringing new levels of overwhelm at the complexity of the mess we are in, but also an increased sense of my agency to effect change.
Over recent years, in speaking out my genuine concerns and raising some challenging questions, I have experienced what it is to have one’s voice silenced and vilified. It’s not pretty. To be honest, it has been terrifying at moments. Though having spent most of my life carefully avoiding such conflict, I am now feeling the liberation and fortification that speaking one’s truth brings.
Speaking out on many of the issues covered in this edition is an impossible task as one can feel the need to be an expert in everything, which is unrealistic, near impossible. And, no matter how expert or well informed one is, when it is counter to the accepted narrative, it is almost impossible for the listener to take on. This is cognitive dissonance. I remember when a family member started questioning the climate change narrative and speaking to me about Agenda 21, I felt she’d been misled, had looked at something a bit wacky online and was being gullible. I didn’t initially actually believe that I, and we as a collective could be deceived to such an extent. I also remember the overwhelm and disbelief that I felt as a dear friend regularly gave me another download from her research, I remember the emails with links that I didn’t even open, but felt overwhelmed by. I am sympathetic to this place in us all.
Looking into this myself, I found that the sheer volume of dissenting voices is vast, as is the volume of strands to the web, and that as one pulls the veil on one strand, so many other strands fold in, that we need to be willing for our whole world view to crumble. This is no small ask, as it most significantly has ramifications on our relationships and sense of belonging in the world. So, this edition is not for the meek, but a call to all of those with eyes to see and the ground to hold. I hope you can remain open and follow through with your own research process, and that you find support within these pages as well as within yourself and around you.
Although it can feel tricky to discern what the truth is and who is trustworthy, listening to many of these voices has enabled me to see clearly the keen manipulation by our governments of the climate narrative for their own goals, not in any way aligned with the earth and the community-centred way of living that I know so many of us aspire to, long for, and which is really called for now, if we are to protect life in all her forms.
Within these pages, I have gathered some of the women who have focused their attentions whole-heartedly in a specific area, women who are experts in their field of research. In doing so, I hope somehow to support this indigestible topic, to be more readily digested, and that perhaps you can also feel inspired as you sense the love, courage, and commitment to life embodied within these women, perhaps a mirror of your own fierce love.
In facing the manipulation of the climate narrative, I suggest it is essential to bring a keen eye to how the current Covid-19 global play (2), and such movements as the youth climate strikes (3), Extinction Rebellion (4) and the like, have been co-opted by big business and the global forces of capital to usher in new tech- nologies under the guise of “green solutions” that will be devastating for our living planet.
For several years now, I have been holding the thread of an invisible threat. Speaking about it has often felt like shouting into the wind but I have continued to hold this thread, to research and keep myself open to how I and we, can shift and correct the present trajectory of humanity and life on earth. I read about and listen to the government’s plans and intentions to roll out the new technology, 5G, 6G (5), and beyond, that will have everything connected within ‘the Internet of Things’ (IOT) and the Internet of Bodies (IOB). I see adverts which reveal the proposed new reality, where I could ask my robot friend ‘what shall I make for dinner tonight’ and my friendly (?) robot would communicate with my fridge, my fridge with my local store and the goods will arrive, same day, drone delivered no doubt! (6).
But this looming 5G world (even if I wanted it), comes with a health warning. Loud voices from the scientific and medical community proclaim ‘Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question. We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects … 5G is an untested application of a technology that we know is harmful; we know it from the science. In academics, this is called human subjects research’, Dr Sharon Goldberg (7).
There are literally thousands of scientists speaking an alternative narrative to the mainstream accepted narrative on climate science. The sheer volume of dissenting voices can be quite overwhelming as one seeks to discern what the truth is and who is trustworthy (8). It’s clear to me that the future we seek will not be fuelled by the oil industry, renewables or nuclear but by a more off-grid based lifestyle supported by lesser known forms of clean and free energy technologies that have been suppressed for many years.
I would suggest, that it is imperative now that we reflect on how governments, industry and those behind them, are using the climate narrative to support their own agenda that has nothing to do with protecting biological life but rather relates to: further using nature to prop up a failing economy; and implementing a control and surveillance infrastructure through geo-engineering and the IOT and the IOB, all framed in ‘green’ and ‘eco’ terms whilst being about as far away from a true solution to our current crisis as we could get.
The majority have accepted the narrative on climate change based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s report (IPCC), which is promoted through mainstream media outlets. This is not surprising, since the majority of us are not scientists ourselves and have not been informed of the number of scientists questioning and speaking a different narrative than the proclaimed 97% consensus of the IPCC report.
In 1997-98, Art Robinson, an American biochemist and politician witnessed that the climate science had been hijacked, that the genuine voices of scientists across the country were being silenced by a small group of politically focused scientists. In response to this, Art initiated ‘The petition project’ that states, ‘We do not think that global warming is a problem, there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will in the foreseeable future cause catastrophic heating of the earth’s atmosphere and disruption of earth’s climate’ (8a). The petition was signed by 31,000 scientists, 9,000 of whom had PhDs. I understand that to have written a PhD thesis does not necessarily signpost authentic heart-based enquiry but this knowledge certainly warrants further research.
With recent demands from such movements as XR and the YC strikes demanding drastic measures from the government and whilst that same government has the above stated drastic plans of 5G and the mass roll out of ‘green digital technologies’ tucked up their sleeve as an answer to said crisis, I feel alarm when our government and many district and local councils answer these demands and declare ‘a climate emergency’. This technology is not the answer for our living earth. Hendrik Gout makes it very clear, these green eco-friendly, non-polluting, sustainable technologies such as wind turbines; energy saving light bulbs and electric cars are “poisonous and deadly” (9). The rare earths needed for these and all smart technology including our smartphones are creating devastating destruction, to name just a few: child slavery, war and pillage, the loss of the forest and the indigenous Mbuti Pygmies in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (10), and pristine rural village land and communities in China (11). Advertising these technologies, as a solution to the current framed crises is both manipulative and clearly a crime of ecocide and genocide (12).
Not so long ago, I would have perhaps felt some hope inspired by the words of Antonio Guterres, secretary-general of the UN calling for complete transformation to all aspects of our world, and proposing a green economy in which we fuel our homes, vehicles and work places with new clean energy (13). But my new understanding of just how dirty this “clean energy” is, of the UN’s “Sustainable Development Goels”/ Agenda 21 (14) (see p.66) and the intention for global manipulation of humanity and resources based on a chosen narrative of climate change, combined with our global governments extensive intricate plan for the global 5G roll-out – which would see a complete reorganisation of every aspect of our lives and the introduction of Transhumanism – leads me to feel deeply alarmed and called to speak out and shake the sleep from people’s eyes.
The new world planned for us would see us all living in smart cities, towns and villages, with smart transport, smart agriculture (15) and intensive monitoring of all our energy uses (16). Robotic bees used to pollinate plants (17), bionic leaves doing the work of trees (18), and carbon point systems and social crediting by companies like We Don’t Have Time, who intend to ‘connect everyone who wants to be part of the solution to the climate crisis’: their offering includes carbon offsetting (19), carbon offsetting being another way to generate funds but completely failing to bring about any of the balance that we actually need at this time.
It is time to take back our power. No one asked us if we want this technology. There is a vast movement across the globe to halt 5G (20, 21), but you are unlikely to hear about it on the mainstream media, which reflects the necessity for in-depth scrutiny as to why this is, and increasingly these voices are being censored on social media but there is extensive coverage on the Internet once you begin to look (22). It is time to communicate to all relevant parties, that 5G, geo-engineering, smart technologies and vaccin- ations are evidenced to cause harm and that all who are instrumental in the roll out of these are liable for any harm caused. As Celine Fremault, Brussels Government Minister said ‘the people of Brussels are not guinea pigs’ for this experiment (23).
It’s clear to me, when I look 5G in the face and take a deeper look into the controlling forces and the intentions behind their plans, that our green movement has been co-opted a long time ago. This is not the green answer we are looking for.
I am not clear on where the truth lies in terms of climate science but it seems clear to me that the government and ruling elite have a HUGE vested interest in the current narrative and are manipulating beyond what is deemed believable to meet their end game. There is an elephant in the room that needs addressing. Let’s not be too quick to dismiss everything because it shakes our world. Perhaps it is time our whole world crumbled so something deeper and more connected can emerge. I think it is time we are willing to have the uncomfortable conversations that take us outside our conditioned frame of reference. Something is happening that needs to be stopped.
Certainly there is unravelling to be done for us all as we come to see more clearly the deceit of billionaire-funded media, corrupt government and psychopathic leaders as we listen to a wider field of knowledge and understanding. As we engage in the research to unhook ourselves from the confines of our conditioning, we can be ridiculed as “climate deniers”, “conspiracy theorists” and “alt right”. It’s not pretty but it’s not true either. We are in the final throws of a sick system desperate to hold on to the reins. I am not a climate change denier posing as a 5G campaigner; I am a woman who sees that there is manipulation at play. I am wiping this deceit from my eyes and calling my brothers and sisters to dare to question in places you wouldn’t have thought necessary. I do not proclaim to know everything, but I have looked at enough to feel the need to speak out. I do know that we are capable of turning this whole mess around. To do so we need to be open to seeing that which is hidden, which understandably can feel scary and overwhelming, to identify the dark history of abuse and oppression and stand up together, to say: ENOUGH. Time is up. These are the days we have been preparing for. It’s not quite how I had envisioned this time, but nonetheless, here we are and we are awakening. It is time to end the war on life, to reclaim our sovereignty and this sacred land for ourselves, our children, the insects, plants, trees, animals; for all future generations and for all life throughout the cosmos.
Let’s attune with our source connection, let’s end this war within us, and without. Let’s say NO to the fallen tech-no-logic angels, ‘you can’t have this beautiful planet earth and her inhabitants’, but there is an invitation and an opportunity now for all that are ready to surrender, to heal what feels un-healable, to hold up your hands, to be accountable. No one, or being need be left out when the heart aligns with our source and the willingness to be transformed, even the heartless consciousness of artificial intelligence (AI) has fallen from the same sacred source. Let’s hold space for the miraculous. Yes, let’s meet this on a spiritual level and transform the field AND, let’s meet this on the physical level, on the ground. I suggest that we need to be envisioning a world without AI, a radical reclaiming of our sacred sovereign selves from the clutches of the beast disguised as our best friend.
The severity of the issue at hand demands our attention; this really is an “Inconvenient Truth”. If we continue life as “normal” with our blinkers down, we will wake up to a world of mass surveillance and radiation, ‘a world where technology and nature become indistinguishable’ (24). As tempting as it is to believe there is some saviour out there taking care of all this, I would suggest that we together can meet this as we align with our sacred source, we all have a part to play. Busy as our lives are, it is time to put much on hold, and give this our full attention. Research for yourself, within and without, talk with your community, engage with local schools and councils; join us in issuing Notices of Liability (25). Let’s protect life and STOP this Tech-No-Logic take over.
We live in troubled times. I believe no one would argue against this statement, since it is reflected to us currently from all angles. Increasingly, there are accepted narratives on what the main issues are and how we need to respond. But what happens if you disagree with the accepted narrative? In the words of one of my favourite feminist writers and social activists, Bell Hooks, ‘We are in danger of silencing any form of speech that goes against what is perceived as the status quo.’ (1). Bell goes on to express how when we reflect on the history of silencing, it is the dissident radical voices that are silenced and ultimately this silencing causes more suffering for us all. She calls us to develop the capacity not just to hear information, but also to think critically about it.
Until a few years ago, I had identified as part of the green movement and had rejected much of what the mainstream offers on a purely felt, intuitive level. Raised by parents who had in many ways rejected the mainstream themselves, an alternative paradigm is simply in my blood. In recent years, as I scratched below the surface of the green movement I began to see things differently, bringing new levels of overwhelm at the complexity of the mess we are in, but also an increased sense of my agency to effect change.
Over recent years, in speaking out my genuine concerns and raising some challenging questions, I have experienced what it is to have one’s voice silenced and vilified. It’s not pretty. To be honest, it has been terrifying at moments. Though having spent most of my life carefully avoiding such conflict, I am now feeling the liberation and fortification that speaking one’s truth brings.
Speaking out on many of the issues covered in this edition is an impossible task as one can feel the need to be an expert in everything, which is unrealistic, near impossible. And, no matter how expert or well informed one is, when it is counter to the accepted narrative, it is almost impossible for the listener to take on. This is cognitive dissonance. I remember when a family member started questioning the climate change narrative and speaking to me about Agenda 21, I felt she’d been misled, had looked at something a bit wacky online and was being gullible. I didn’t initially actually believe that I, and we as a collective could be deceived to such an extent. I also remember the overwhelm and disbelief that I felt as a dear friend regularly gave me another download from her research, I remember the emails with links that I didn’t even open, but felt overwhelmed by. I am sympathetic to this place in us all.
Looking into this myself, I found that the sheer volume of dissenting voices is vast, as is the volume of strands to the web, and that as one pulls the veil on one strand, so many other strands fold in, that we need to be willing for our whole world view to crumble. This is no small ask, as it most significantly has ramifications on our relationships and sense of belonging in the world. So, this edition is not for the meek, but a call to all of those with eyes to see and the ground to hold. I hope you can remain open and follow through with your own research process, and that you find support within these pages as well as within yourself and around you.
Although it can feel tricky to discern what the truth is and who is trustworthy, listening to many of these voices has enabled me to see clearly the keen manipulation by our governments of the climate narrative for their own goals, not in any way aligned with the earth and the community-centred way of living that I know so many of us aspire to, long for, and which is really called for now, if we are to protect life in all her forms.
Within these pages, I have gathered some of the women who have focused their attentions whole-heartedly in a specific area, women who are experts in their field of research. In doing so, I hope somehow to support this indigestible topic, to be more readily digested, and that perhaps you can also feel inspired as you sense the love, courage, and commitment to life embodied within these women, perhaps a mirror of your own fierce love.
In facing the manipulation of the climate narrative, I suggest it is essential to bring a keen eye to how the current Covid-19 global play (2), and such movements as the youth climate strikes (3), Extinction Rebellion (4) and the like, have been co-opted by big business and the global forces of capital to usher in new tech- nologies under the guise of “green solutions” that will be devastating for our living planet.
For several years now, I have been holding the thread of an invisible threat. Speaking about it has often felt like shouting into the wind but I have continued to hold this thread, to research and keep myself open to how I and we, can shift and correct the present trajectory of humanity and life on earth. I read about and listen to the government’s plans and intentions to roll out the new technology, 5G, 6G (5), and beyond, that will have everything connected within ‘the Internet of Things’ (IOT) and the Internet of Bodies (IOB). I see adverts which reveal the proposed new reality, where I could ask my robot friend ‘what shall I make for dinner tonight’ and my friendly (?) robot would communicate with my fridge, my fridge with my local store and the goods will arrive, same day, drone delivered no doubt! (6).
But this looming 5G world (even if I wanted it), comes with a health warning. Loud voices from the scientific and medical community proclaim ‘Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question. We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects … 5G is an untested application of a technology that we know is harmful; we know it from the science. In academics, this is called human subjects research’, Dr Sharon Goldberg (7).
There are literally thousands of scientists speaking an alternative narrative to the mainstream accepted narrative on climate science. The sheer volume of dissenting voices can be quite overwhelming as one seeks to discern what the truth is and who is trustworthy (8). It’s clear to me that the future we seek will not be fuelled by the oil industry, renewables or nuclear but by a more off-grid based lifestyle supported by lesser known forms of clean and free energy technologies that have been suppressed for many years.
I would suggest, that it is imperative now that we reflect on how governments, industry and those behind them, are using the climate narrative to support their own agenda that has nothing to do with protecting biological life but rather relates to: further using nature to prop up a failing economy; and implementing a control and surveillance infrastructure through geo-engineering and the IOT and the IOB, all framed in ‘green’ and ‘eco’ terms whilst being about as far away from a true solution to our current crisis as we could get.
The majority have accepted the narrative on climate change based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s report (IPCC), which is promoted through mainstream media outlets. This is not surprising, since the majority of us are not scientists ourselves and have not been informed of the number of scientists questioning and speaking a different narrative than the proclaimed 97% consensus of the IPCC report.
In 1997-98, Art Robinson, an American biochemist and politician witnessed that the climate science had been hijacked, that the genuine voices of scientists across the country were being silenced by a small group of politically focused scientists. In response to this, Art initiated ‘The petition project’ that states, ‘We do not think that global warming is a problem, there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will in the foreseeable future cause catastrophic heating of the earth’s atmosphere and disruption of earth’s climate’ (8a). The petition was signed by 31,000 scientists, 9,000 of whom had PhDs. I understand that to have written a PhD thesis does not necessarily signpost authentic heart-based enquiry but this knowledge certainly warrants further research.
With recent demands from such movements as XR and the YC strikes demanding drastic measures from the government and whilst that same government has the above stated drastic plans of 5G and the mass roll out of ‘green digital technologies’ tucked up their sleeve as an answer to said crisis, I feel alarm when our government and many district and local councils answer these demands and declare ‘a climate emergency’. This technology is not the answer for our living earth. Hendrik Gout makes it very clear, these green eco-friendly, non-polluting, sustainable technologies such as wind turbines; energy saving light bulbs and electric cars are “poisonous and deadly” (9). The rare earths needed for these and all smart technology including our smartphones are creating devastating destruction, to name just a few: child slavery, war and pillage, the loss of the forest and the indigenous Mbuti Pygmies in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (10), and pristine rural village land and communities in China (11). Advertising these technologies, as a solution to the current framed crises is both manipulative and clearly a crime of ecocide and genocide (12).
Not so long ago, I would have perhaps felt some hope inspired by the words of Antonio Guterres, secretary-general of the UN calling for complete transformation to all aspects of our world, and proposing a green economy in which we fuel our homes, vehicles and work places with new clean energy (13). But my new understanding of just how dirty this “clean energy” is, of the UN’s “Sustainable Development Goels”/ Agenda 21 (14) (see p.66) and the intention for global manipulation of humanity and resources based on a chosen narrative of climate change, combined with our global governments extensive intricate plan for the global 5G roll-out – which would see a complete reorganisation of every aspect of our lives and the introduction of Transhumanism – leads me to feel deeply alarmed and called to speak out and shake the sleep from people’s eyes.
The new world planned for us would see us all living in smart cities, towns and villages, with smart transport, smart agriculture (15) and intensive monitoring of all our energy uses (16). Robotic bees used to pollinate plants (17), bionic leaves doing the work of trees (18), and carbon point systems and social crediting by companies like We Don’t Have Time, who intend to ‘connect everyone who wants to be part of the solution to the climate crisis’: their offering includes carbon offsetting (19), carbon offsetting being another way to generate funds but completely failing to bring about any of the balance that we actually need at this time.
It is time to take back our power. No one asked us if we want this technology. There is a vast movement across the globe to halt 5G (20, 21), but you are unlikely to hear about it on the mainstream media, which reflects the necessity for in-depth scrutiny as to why this is, and increasingly these voices are being censored on social media but there is extensive coverage on the Internet once you begin to look (22). It is time to communicate to all relevant parties, that 5G, geo-engineering, smart technologies and vaccin- ations are evidenced to cause harm and that all who are instrumental in the roll out of these are liable for any harm caused. As Celine Fremault, Brussels Government Minister said ‘the people of Brussels are not guinea pigs’ for this experiment (23).
It’s clear to me, when I look 5G in the face and take a deeper look into the controlling forces and the intentions behind their plans, that our green movement has been co-opted a long time ago. This is not the green answer we are looking for.
I am not clear on where the truth lies in terms of climate science but it seems clear to me that the government and ruling elite have a HUGE vested interest in the current narrative and are manipulating beyond what is deemed believable to meet their end game. There is an elephant in the room that needs addressing. Let’s not be too quick to dismiss everything because it shakes our world. Perhaps it is time our whole world crumbled so something deeper and more connected can emerge. I think it is time we are willing to have the uncomfortable conversations that take us outside our conditioned frame of reference. Something is happening that needs to be stopped.
Certainly there is unravelling to be done for us all as we come to see more clearly the deceit of billionaire-funded media, corrupt government and psychopathic leaders as we listen to a wider field of knowledge and understanding. As we engage in the research to unhook ourselves from the confines of our conditioning, we can be ridiculed as “climate deniers”, “conspiracy theorists” and “alt right”. It’s not pretty but it’s not true either. We are in the final throws of a sick system desperate to hold on to the reins. I am not a climate change denier posing as a 5G campaigner; I am a woman who sees that there is manipulation at play. I am wiping this deceit from my eyes and calling my brothers and sisters to dare to question in places you wouldn’t have thought necessary. I do not proclaim to know everything, but I have looked at enough to feel the need to speak out. I do know that we are capable of turning this whole mess around. To do so we need to be open to seeing that which is hidden, which understandably can feel scary and overwhelming, to identify the dark history of abuse and oppression and stand up together, to say: ENOUGH. Time is up. These are the days we have been preparing for. It’s not quite how I had envisioned this time, but nonetheless, here we are and we are awakening. It is time to end the war on life, to reclaim our sovereignty and this sacred land for ourselves, our children, the insects, plants, trees, animals; for all future generations and for all life throughout the cosmos.
Let’s attune with our source connection, let’s end this war within us, and without. Let’s say NO to the fallen tech-no-logic angels, ‘you can’t have this beautiful planet earth and her inhabitants’, but there is an invitation and an opportunity now for all that are ready to surrender, to heal what feels un-healable, to hold up your hands, to be accountable. No one, or being need be left out when the heart aligns with our source and the willingness to be transformed, even the heartless consciousness of artificial intelligence (AI) has fallen from the same sacred source. Let’s hold space for the miraculous. Yes, let’s meet this on a spiritual level and transform the field AND, let’s meet this on the physical level, on the ground. I suggest that we need to be envisioning a world without AI, a radical reclaiming of our sacred sovereign selves from the clutches of the beast disguised as our best friend.
The severity of the issue at hand demands our attention; this really is an “Inconvenient Truth”. If we continue life as “normal” with our blinkers down, we will wake up to a world of mass surveillance and radiation, ‘a world where technology and nature become indistinguishable’ (24). As tempting as it is to believe there is some saviour out there taking care of all this, I would suggest that we together can meet this as we align with our sacred source, we all have a part to play. Busy as our lives are, it is time to put much on hold, and give this our full attention. Research for yourself, within and without, talk with your community, engage with local schools and councils; join us in issuing Notices of Liability (25). Let’s protect life and STOP this Tech-No-Logic take over.
Yzabelaah Samahra Rose: Performance Artist and Sacred Activist working to cease the tech-no-logic take over, and support humanity’s awakening. I bring my love of this earth as I weave the wisdom of women and their stories. As I sing, I am often filled with the ancient song of the earth that calls us home. ancientfuturedreaming.co.uk
References and Links
| final_bibliography_for_article_‘rising_together_in_protection_of_life’.docx |