Virus - Time to Re-evaluate?

Magdalene Taylor

​ Never in the history of the world have we experienced the situation we presently find ourselves in. Since the World Health Organisation declared a coronavirus pandemic on 11 March 2020, we have been bombarded daily with the number of alleged deaths and cases from a novel disease called Covid-19. Worldwide those who are glued to mainstream media, believing every word, are placed in a state of extreme fear. We have been told that there is a virus spreading across the globe that may be fatal for some of us. Lockdowns have been insisted on in some countries, with draconian restrictions having been put in place. Stay at home to prevent the spread, regularly wash your hands, wear a mask when going outside for your exercise or shopping, and adhere to social distancing of two metres and stop the spread!
 
There is however a very big problem with this story – a virus is not a living organism.
 
The vast majority of us have grown up with the belief that germs are our enemy and that we must either destroy them or be protected from them. That these germs can randomly invade our bodies, infect us and lead to specific diseases. From when we are small, adverts on TV are telling us about products that will kill 99% of all known germs instantly.
 
We are also told that these germs are bacteria, fungal or virus, the latter being just very tiny germs – much smaller than the other forms. One very important aspect that is NOT generally indicated about virus is that they do not have any functions of life. Bacteria are living organisms and can move, digest, excrete, reproduce etc. whereas a virus has none of these abilities. Why would scientists and medical professionals believe in the existence of a vast number of species of virus, if they are not alive? The word ‘species’ gives the impression of something living.


Let’s first take a glance into the established belief system held by modern medicine, which is based on the germ theory of disease.
 
Most people have heard of Louis Pasteur and his germ theory, but most are not aware that he had many critics, and throughout the twentieth century books have been published exposing his fraudulent science. On 16 May 1995 the New York Times reported sensational discoveries in the diaries of Pasteur. Professor Geison of the Historical Institute at the University of Princeton, USA, after reviewing over 10,000 pages of Pasteur’s diaries, reported that if the results of Pasteur’s experiments did not live up to his expectations, he modified his experiments until they provided the outcome desired to prove his ideas. This meant that Pasteur had deliberately falsified scientific experiments to suit his own purpose.


Interestingly at around the same time there was another French scientist, Antoine Béchamp who held a very different theory regarding disease. Based on his observations and experimentation he reached the terrain theory of disease. To put it in a nutshell Béchamp arrived at the conclusion that disease arose due to the state of the inner terrain. In other words it started from within the host organism due to unhealthy conditions. This could be as a result of many things; primarily living conditions, lifestyle, lack of sanitation due to no supply of clean water, poor nutritional state, and even emotional stress. Rather than looking for drugs and vaccines to kill or protect from the supposed invading germ, Béchamp’s theory required people to address all those areas that influenced the state of their inner terrain, and hence their health.
 
Going back to Pasteur, apparently when he could not find the presence of bacteria in some disease situations e.g rabies, he came to believe that the disease was caused by invisible agents too small to be seen with the microscope. Decades later with the advancement of the electron microscope these supposed minuscule particles of disease termed ‘virus’ were observed (although not purified and isolated), and assumed to be the infective agents of a variety of diseases where no bacteria are present. Even though it is acknowledged that viruses are not living cells and that they are in fact tiny packets of genetic material. The assumption by science was, and still is, that they somehow hijack living cells in order to reproduce and infect the cells leading to a viral disease. Science did not consider any other explanation due to the ingrained dogma from the accepted theory of infection by a specific invading germ. Germ and virus theory are both heavily protected areas of medicine that anyone who dare question them are met with hostility and censorship, and usually experience a change in direction as regards to their career. Many prefer to keep a low profile even if they have doubts, due to fear of the repercussions alongside the ridicule from their professional colleagues.
 
What is a virus, is there proof that they exist?
 
Going back to, for example, the ninth century Rhazes, an important figure in the history of medicine, studied in particular, smallpox and measles, two presently accepted viral diseases. However Rhazes viewed these conditions as the body eliminating impurities from within to cleanse the internal terrain and apparently did not attach much importance to the idea of contagiousness. It is interesting that the term virus comes from the Latin for poison. Even during the nineteenth century many of the diseases such as typhus, scarlet fever, measles and smallpox came under an umbrella term ‘zymotic’ disease or fevers, and were viewed as cleansing efforts by the body to purge the system of impurities. It is also interesting to read that during the first major documented polio outbreak in the US, Rutland County, Vermont in 1894 Dr Charles Caverly, who was apparently one of the first physicians to recognise that polio could occur with or without paralysis, stated the following regarding contagium:
“The element of contagium does not enter into the etiology either. I find but a single instance in which more than one member of a family had the disease, and as it usually occurred in families of more than one child and as no efforts were made at isolation, it is very certain that is was non-contagious.”
However apparently Caverly‘s view began to change after 1909, when it was claimed by ‘science’ that the poliovirus had been isolated as the cause. Science had declared there was a virus, and as usual most doctors accepted this without question even if they had made very different observations previously.
 
A paper entitled: ‘Viruses and Koch’s Postulates’ was published in the Journal of Bacteriology in 1937 by Thomas M Rivers (from The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York). Rivers indicated that there was not full agreement as to a virus-causing disease as the evidence did not meet with all the conditions laid out by scientist Robert Koch. Koch’s four postulates were used to prove that any suspected infectious agents caused disease. All four conditions had to be met for proof of infection by a specific germ. This however could not be met particularly with viral illness, as virus could not be cultivated on ordinary lifeless media. The author comments on how the blind adherence to Koch’s postulates may act as a ‘hindrance’ especially for virus. In other words, when the desired outcomes are not being observed, then these postulates need to be altered. Given the fact that viruses are non-living, it is hardly surprising that this non-living material could not be cultivated on a lifeless media.


It is no wonder that the samples of assumed virus had to be grown on living cells e.g monkey kidney cells. This brings into question what exactly is being grown in labs? Non-living viruses, along with other material that is present due to the virus not being totally purified and isolated, is introduced into a petri-dish of living cells from e.g another species, or even cancer cells (eg HeLa cells), which also contain impurities.These cultivations then go on to be used in the development and production of vaccines and introduced by injection into the human system, from young babies to the elderly.  Do you feel reassured that these experts know what they may be creating?

In very recent times Dr Andrew Kaufman, a US medically-trained doctor, has emerged into the public arena raising many concerns on germ and viral theory that most scientists or doctors have blindly accepted. Initially Kaufman hesitated to speak out publicly, however due to not being beholden to any academic institution where he has to maintain the paradigm that is held by that institution, he has been able to speak relatively freely given all the censorship that is taking place at present. As you can guess YouTube have been actively removing many of his interviews – critical thinking is becoming looked upon as a crime these days.
 
Dr Kaufman has given numerous interviews over the last couple of months detailing how not only is there a complete lack of evidence that there is presently a coronavirus causing excess mortality or some kind of illness, but more importantly, that there’s actually no real evidence of any disease-causing virus when you start to delve into the published literature. Coronavirus are a family that were ‘identified’ decades ago, however Kaufman points out that the methodology to identify any virus and all the assumed virus strains is questionable, and that they have never been individually isolated and purified, nor have they met with the established criteria for proving that a virus of any kind causes any disease.
 
He also goes on to suggest that there is a great deal of indication that the relatively recent discovery of tiny particles called exosomes (1983) share astounding similarities to what mainstream scientists have identified and called virus particles. Kaufman states that it has been observed in experiments that some exosomes take up toxic substances outside our cells and protect us from the effects of those toxins. Essentially they are a response to diseases, not the cause. However, due to exosomes being recognised as originating from our own cells, whereas virus are assumed to infect our cells, the very notion that they may be the very same thing has not been investigated by scientists. And who would fund such studies as it would not be in the interest of modern medicine if these particles are the same. It certainly would not be welcomed by the vaccine industry given all the vaccines that are on the market supposedly protecting us from a variety of alleged viral diseases.
 
By now you may be wondering how then is this coronavirus infecting people worldwide?
We are being told worldwide that cases and deaths occurring from Covid-19 are vast. Daily updates broadcast all kinds of worrying figures, whereas prior to this pandemic most people had no idea how many deaths normally occur each month let alone every 24 hours. Yet throughout this period there have been doctors pointing out that the vast majority of deaths are in those who are elderly and mostly with more than one serious pre-existing health condition. It has been asked a number of times - are these patients dying WITH Covid-19 rather than from it? Others are indicating that they are not noticing anything drastically different to a normal flu outbreak. Not surprisingly, these individuals are not being interviewed by the established media channels or press at all.
 
Prof. Püschel, head of forensic medicine at the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf and his colleagues are responsible for autopsying all those who allegedly died of Covid-19 in Hamburg. In a video interview for RAIR Foundation USA, 7 May 2020 he stated that in his opinion the fear of the virus is being exaggerated and that it is a comparatively harmless disease and that labelling it a killer virus is inappropriate and creating fear. He went on to say that not one person had died from C19 alone – that they had at least one or even several serious diseases such as cardiovascular disease, heart attack, enlarged heart, COPD, liver disease, diabetes - and with an average age of 80 years old. During autopsies Püschel is finding pneumonia and other complications – super bacteria infections, nosocomial infections (conditions due to hospital or undergoing medical treatment) also present.
 
Some doctors are reporting that Covid-19 death certificates are being manipulated. Dr Annie Bukacek in Montana, who has been filling out death certificates over 30 year period, stated at a meeting that few people know how much individual power is given to the physician, coroner or medical examiner signing the certificate. She also talked about how autopsies are often not performed, and that even when they are, physicians have to make their best ‘guesstimate’ to complete the form. The inaccurate data is then used for statistical analysis! This data then becomes accepted as factual information even though much of it is false. Death certificates are based on assumptions and educated guesses that go unquestioned. There is also no universal definition of a Covid-19 death, and for example in the US the CDC accept both confirmed and presumed deaths. Other doctors such as Dr Scott Jensen in Minnesota also raised similar concerns on how they are being advised to diagnose C-19 on the death certificate if that individual had been recently in contact with someone who was found to be positive, even if there is no sign of C-19. These are only two examples, and this highlights how all data on what is truly going on at present is highly questionable and grossly inaccurate and unreliable. The more you investigate, the more you may start to ask, does this pandemic exist or is this a well-orchestrated story closely resembling The Emperor’s New Clothes?
 
And what a very convenient time to declare a pandemic – the timing fits nicely with one of the annual peak periods we experience with these type of conditions. I wonder if the second wave that is being insisted on will be at the other normal peak time in late September? I can only urge you to start investigating and come to your own conclusions.
 
Finally to sum up about coronavirus, could it be that all these different cold and flu viruses that we are told annually infect us are simply the body encapsulating and throwing out poisons from our cells, cellular debris, a strand or two of RNA or DNA, and so on. In other words, are these viral particles tiny packages of cellular rubbish? Whilst we produce this kind of activity daily to different degrees, there are annual peaks for a ‘detox’ around the time of the spring and autumn equinox as we enter or leave the winter period. This would explain why many people display similar symptoms at similar times. Also individuals all exposed to a poison such as polluted air in a specific area could also result in a clustering of cases.
 
If these expressions are allowed to run their course, not suppressed by medications, would we see an increase in health? And for those considered less healthy, can we assist them through this cleansing operation by boosting their health with vitamin C therapy, for example? Suppression of our body’s action by medication and inappropriate medical procedures may result in chronic or degenerative conditions or worse. Recent reports by health professionals indicating that the use of ventilators are resulting in many patient deaths is another grave concern. Some are speculating that there will be more deaths due to the lockdown rather than any alleged virus.
 
Is it time to let go of questionable theories of the past and start looking at the marvels of our body’s own intelligence, and supporting it through a required cleansing action? Modern medicine has long been in the pocket of the pharmaceutical industry and this is not a healthy state of affairs.
And as for virus……perhaps one day it will be recognised as the exosome process?

---

References and Suggested Reading
 
Dr Andrew Kaufman – A Doctor Speaks Out  https://youtu.be/APaUEgfeAYE
 
Renne, EP, Vermont Historical Society; The 1917 Polio Outbreak  in Montpelier, Vermont. https://vermonthistory.org/journal/79/VHS79021917PolioOutbreak.pdf
 
Forensic Doctor Destroys Media Lies: ''Nobody died of Covid in Hamburg without Previous Illnesses''  https://youtu.be/HYl-7jJAksc

Death Certificates, Dr Bukacek, Montana  https://youtu.be/J04YzligPyU

Death Certificates, Dr Scott Jensen https://youtu.be/lsRay1wInBg

​The Private Science of Louis Pasteur (1995). Prof Geison
 
Pasteur Exposed (1923) E D Hume
What Really Makes You Ill?: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong (2019); Dawn Lester & David Parker

---

Magdalene Taylor is director & editor of The Informed Parent (TiP) and one of the founders of TiP which emerged in September 1992. Since 1994, Magdalene single-handedly continues running the organisation and producing a regular newsletter, which has now been in publication for 28 years. Main focus is to promote an informed decision regarding vaccination decisions.  www.informedparent.co.uk